Revista Umělec 2003/3 >> PIN A MEDAL ON THAT BOY (The Jindřich Chalupecký Prize) Lista de todas las ediciones
PIN A MEDAL ON THAT BOY (The Jindřich Chalupecký Prize)
Revista Umělec
Año 2003, 3
6,50 EUR
8 USD
Enviar la edición impresa:
Suscripción de orden

PIN A MEDAL ON THAT BOY (The Jindřich Chalupecký Prize)

Revista Umělec 2003/3

01.03.2003

Redakce | commentary | en cs

"The Jindřich Chalupecký Prize was awarded to Michal Pěchouček at the end of 2003. The award, which we take great pleasure and irony in comparing to the British Turner Prize, has survived another year, though it has gone through crucial transformations in meaning for this country. Until recently, this was due to its founder Václav Havel and his close connection to the values of the regime established after the revolution in 1989. The prize was founded in 1990 and fulfilled the desire of artists to focus on mutual competition and qualities unburdened by history. And because the Czech Republic is not Great Britain and the Jindřich Chalupecký Prize is not the Turner Prize, it has remained a mere “award” without response.
But the affection of the National Gallery has evaporated and the president has become an “extraordinary” ordinary citizen. After last year’s stop over in Dům umění in Brno (publicly praised for being fresh, but in fact it marked an exit from the limelight) this year the award returned to the capital. However, it was Futura who took it in — a space which is establishing itself, but for now has only entered the consciousness of the close-knit art public. This time Václav Havel awarded the prize personally, but there’s no more: “where’s Havel? There’re crowds of people, journalists and TV crews…” The Jindřich Chalupecký Prize looks as if it’s becoming one of those prizes that springs up, supports the winner for some time, gives him some money, sets him up for a stay abroad, or at least a catalogue… but he’ll never make it out of the smoke-filled den of thieves that is the art community.
The award going to Michal Pěchouček was generally accepted, although after the vague show of five finalists, Ján Mančuška was mentioned most
often. Major objections included the poor media coverage, the strategy of dealing with the public and the international (!) committee’s familiarity with the long-term contributions of the finalists. We asked three personalities from the art scene here to write up their impressions of this year’s competition.

Jiří Ptáček

The Chalupecký Prize is now a well-trodden path, which on the one hand is good news (the continuity is important for the situation in contemporary Czech art, and at least once a year the media is required to take an interest in what’s gong on); on the other hand this brings up questions: Isn’t the apparatus moving ahead in a fairly stereotypical way? Isn’t it time to somehow radically alter the ceremony?
This year’s winner, successful mesmerizer Michal Pěchouček, was selected from a strong group of contenders. Mančuška and Kintera are the best oriented artists of their generation, mixing within the international context, and they’re good at it: Šerých keeps up a high standard of quality, and his “language” is important in the current Czech context. With this kind of layout the choice of a winner is not all that important. Not one artist was the winner — all of them were… and “there’s strength in numbers.” The Chalupecký committee determines the winner in the usual way, but it would be in the interest of Czech art to present all of the finalists (especially this year’s), to work more closely with them, and more than anything, to try and promote them abroad. This kind of institution simply has no other meaning. The Czech media fails to adequately cover of prize, as it lacks genuine art critics, and “higher interests” are decidedly outside of the arts. For financial reasons, it’s impossible to crank up even the most ephemeral television campaign to make the award a more visible spectacle. But it’s possible to do without this if the main criterion is quality and a value standard is determined (what is a new and internally consistent position / approach to contemporary art?). Maybe it would be good to knock off all the “shop talk” and move on to other matters, like improving web pages (10 days after the announcement of the winner the web page hadn’t been updated and an on-line gremlin was making havoc of his name) and putting out catalogues…

David Kulhánek, curator of Display Gallery

In last few years it has become clear that the Chalupecký Prize is slowly, but ineluctable, moving from “official” status into the “unofficial.” The fact that two years ago it was being held in the halls of the largest Czech exhibition institution, the National Gallery, and it is now found in either Brno’s House of Art or in Prague’s Gallery Futura doesn’t mean that it has lost its dignity — but it has certainly lost its distinction. Within these limited spaces it is open to a much narrower circle of viewers, and, furthermore, this turn away from the cultural establishment — though legitimate — has caused a drain of media attention. Paradoxically, this has had a positive influence on the results of the competition. Last year’s and this year’s exhibition were much more dynamic in feeling than the tired installations on the gallery of the vestibule of Veletržní palác. The Chalupecký Award is therefore in the same position as many other local activities in the field of contemporary fine art: the constriction to “underground” status has given the show quality but stolen away public attention, which in this case signifies danger. If, because of media “invisibility,” sponsors lose interest, the contest will surely be put to pasture.

Jan H. Vitvar, curator

The Chalupecký’s in 2003
Unlike the past few years, when I sometimes felt that to be chosen among the finalists I only had to hand in the application form, this year’s contest also concerned those who would never enter it themselves. Maybe this “passive” form of participation was one of the strongest positives for me. The number of finalists has gone up reasonably well and their presentations have come back to Prague. Everything is going well, only I wasn’t chosen again. But it serves me right, because I haven’t put on many exhibitions in the past few years — and what else should the prize be given for? It’s not going to be for charity. I know many artists who help the blind cross the street, buy ribbons, hearts, and magazines to help the homeless... and they too get nothing.
A short tally of the positives of this year’s Chalupecký prize could end with something like “all the fame and glory to the winner, and honor to the losers” but this doesn’t quite fit. My two visits to the Gallery Futura left little impression. So here I add a paragraph of criticism which might find its addressees (though that seems a long shot).
The main problem is the lack of a media campaign. Though the “eyewitnesses and participants of the first years” are now young senior citizens, and the contest itself is not a new thing, it has not really entered the consciousness of the wider public. However, the question is if it is worth it. I know that it’s absurd to ask for the support of the public service media when there are so many third league football matches waiting for release, at least as re-runs. Should fine art act as resistance to sports on TV? Of course we could refer to the creation of some kind of maintenance obligation for the ideological parents of the Chalupecký prize. But can we really expect this from the person who awards the prize every year (—ed. former president Václav Havel), a man who in the very next minute lets himself be portrayed by a smut journalist? Wouldn’t it be
better to use the current president to guarantee the quality of such an event? Anyway, he’ll probably start something up for over-age tennis players, so actually we should be glad that someone remembers the fine arts... There is probably nothing more to do than be happy with what we’ve got and wait till we’re 35 years old and no longer interested.

Milan Salák, artist
"




Comentarios

Actualmente no hay comentarios

Agregar nuevo comentario

Artículos recomendados

Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy
Goff & Rosenthal gallery, Berlin, November 18 - December 30, 2006 Society permanently renegotiates the definition of drugs and our relationship towards them. In his forty-five minute found-footage film The Conquest of Happiness, produced in 2005, Oliver Pietsch, a Berlin-based video artist, demonstrates which drugs society can accommodate, which it cannot, and how the story of the drugs can be…
MIKROB MIKROB
There’s 130 kilos of fat, muscles, brain & raw power on the Serbian contemporary art scene, all molded together into a 175-cm tall, 44-year-old body. It’s owner is known by a countless number of different names, including Bamboo, Mexican, Groom, Big Pain in the Ass, but most of all he’s known as MICROBE!… Hero of the losers, fighter for the rights of the dispossessed, folk artist, entertainer…
Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism
Nick Land was a British philosopher but is no longer, though he is not dead. The almost neurotic fervor with which he scratched at the scars of reality has seduced more than a few promising academics onto the path of art that offends in its originality. The texts that he has left behind are reliably revolting and boring, and impel us to castrate their categorization as “mere” literature.
Malvado Malvado
“La persona debe sacudir tres veces la mano de alguien mientras mantiene fijamente la mirada en sus ojos. Así es como es posible memorizar el nombre de una persona con certeza. De ésta forma es como he recordado los nombres de las 5000 personas que han estado en el Horse Hospital”, me dijo Jim Holland. Holland es un experimentado cineasta, músico y curador. En su infancia, sufrió al pasar por…
04.02.2020 10:17
¿A dónde ir ahora?
fuera
S.d.Ch, Solitarios y Cultura Periférica   (una generación nacida alrededor de 1970)
S.d.Ch, Solitarios y Cultura Periférica (una generación nacida alrededor de 1970)
Josef Jindrák
¿Quién es S.d.Ch? Una persona de muchos intereses –activa en varios campos- la literatura, el teatro, conocida por sus cómics y sus collages en los campos del arte. Un poeta y dramaturgo principalmente. Un solitario por naturaleza y determinación, su trabajo no se encajona en las corrientes actuales. Siempre antepone la enunciación personal, incluso cuando su estructura interna puede volverse…
Leer más...
australia
Spaghetti Sauce on Your Moo Shoo Pork
Charlie Citron
Leer más...
Lithuania
Road trip Lithuania
Road trip Lithuania
Arunase Gudaitas
Aš menininkas — Aš save myliu Vincent van Gogh in one letter to his brother described a café as a place where one could easily go insane. The café in the Center for Contemporary Art (CAC) in Vilnius is such a place. Insider connoisseurs of the local scene consider it “very bohemian” and, indeed, in contrast to traditionally lackluster and overpriced eateries in museums, the atmosphere in the CAC…
Leer más...
reportáž
Under the Shadow of Heroes
Under the Shadow of Heroes
Alena Boika
Leer más...
Libros, video, ediciones y obras de arte que podrían interesarle Ir a la tienda virtual
In this book French photographer Petit, who now lives in Berlin, experiments with shadows and her body, mostly in black and...
Más información...
6 EUR
7 USD
S.d.Ch.: Varlén's Vertical Creche. 2007, 69,7 x 77,8, collage and drawing
Más información...
1 000 EUR
1 199 USD
Kompletní edice (3 díly = 330 stran) Kolážových comiksů „na hraně existence“, tynto „deníky všední úzkosti“ jsou pravou...
Más información...
11 EUR
13 USD

Studio

Divus and its services

Studio Divus designs and develops your ideas for projects, presentations or entire PR packages using all sorts of visual means and media. We offer our clients complete solutions as well as all the individual steps along the way. In our work we bring together the most up-to-date and classic technologies, enabling us to produce a wide range of products. But we do more than just prints and digital projects, ad materials, posters, catalogues, books, the production of screen and space presentations in interiors or exteriors, digital work and image publication on the internet; we also produce digital films—including the editing, sound and 3-D effects—and we use this technology for web pages and for company presentations. We specialize in ...
 

Cita del día El editor no se responsabiliza por los estados físicos o mentales que puedan generarse después de leer la cita

Enlightenment is always late.
Contacto e información del visitante Contactos de la redacción

DIVUS
NOVÁ PERLA
Kyjov 36-37, 407 47 Krásná Lípa
Čzech Republic

 

GALLERY
perla@divus.cz, +420 222 264 830, +420 606 606 425
open from Wednesday to Sunday between 10am to 6pm
and on appointment.

 

CAFÉ & BOOKSHOP
shop@divus.cz, +420 222 264 830, +420 606 606 425
open from Wednesday to Sunday between 10am to 10pm
and on appointment.

 

STUDO & PRINTING
studio@divus.cz, +420 222 264 830, +420 602 269 888
open from Monday to Friday between 10am to 6pm

 

DIVUS PUBLISHING
Ivan Mečl, ivan@divus.cz, +420 602 269 888

 

UMĚLEC MAGAZINE
Palo Fabuš, umelec@divus.cz

DIVUS LONDON
Arch 8, Resolution Way, Deptford
London SE8 4NT, United Kingdom

news@divus.org.uk, +44 (0) 7526 902 082

 

DIVUS BERLIN
berlin@divus.cz


DIVUS WIEN
wien@divus.cz


DIVUS MEXICO CITY
mexico@divus.cz


DIVUS BARCELONA
barcelona@divus.cz

DIVUS MOSCOW & MINSK
alena@divus.cz

SUSCRIPCIÓN AL NEWSLETTER DE DIVUS
Divus We Are Rising National Gallery For You! Go to Kyjov by Krásná Lípa no.37.